Canada's Biggest Data Breaches and Cyberattacks, 2017-2024

This guide brings together and replaces our earlier news posts on Canadian data breaches and cyberattacks from 2017 to 2024, rewritten and expanded in October 2026 as a sourced reference.

A row of data center server racks, one of them standing empty

Between late 2017 and spring 2024, a car lender, Canada's largest telecom company, two major banks, the country's biggest payment processor, a national discount retailer and three federal bodies all reported serious cyber incidents. Some exposed the personal details of hundreds of thousands of customers. Others knocked government systems offline for months. Taken together, they show how varied the risk is: extortion of banks, ransomware gangs that leak data, a breach that started at a marketing vendor, and intrusions into federal networks.

The threat has not eased since. In its National Cyber Threat Assessment 2025-2026, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security says ransomware is "the top cybercrime threat facing Canada's critical infrastructure." This guide sets out each case in order: what happened, the impact as reported by the organization or major outlets, how it responded, and what happened next. It finishes with practical steps for anyone whose data turns up in a breach, and lessons for organizations.

In this guide

The cases at a glance

The timeline below runs from the first case to the latest follow-up we could confirm. Dates are those given by the organizations, regulators or the outlets listed in the sources.

Canadian cyber incidents covered in this guide, 2017 to 2025
  1. May 2017
    Bell Canada says about 1.9 million customer email addresses and about 1,700 names and phone numbers were accessed.
  2. Dec 11, 2017
    Nissan Canada Finance becomes aware of unauthorized access to customer data, later putting the figure at up to 1.13 million people.
  3. Late Jan 2018
    Bell discloses a second breach affecting fewer than 100,000 customers. The RCMP investigates.
  4. May 27-28, 2018
    BMO and CIBC's Simplii Financial say fraudsters may have accessed data on up to 90,000 customers combined. Attackers demand $1 million from each bank.
  5. Nov 1, 2018
    Mandatory breach reporting under PIPEDA, Canada's federal private-sector privacy law, takes effect.
  6. April 2021
    An Ontario court approves class-action settlements of $21.2 million (BMO) and $1.8 million (CIBC) over the 2018 thefts.
  7. November 2023
    The Medusa ransomware gang lists Moneris on its leak site and demands $6 million. Moneris later confirms data from a corporate shared drive was released.
  8. Dec 20, 2023 to Jan 24, 2024
    Unauthorized users are inside Global Affairs Canada's VPN. The department partly shuts remote access on Jan. 24.
  9. Late February 2024
    The RCMP discloses a "cyber event" on its networks and opens a criminal investigation.
  10. Feb 26, 2024
    The Privacy Commissioner opens an investigation into the Global Affairs breach.
  11. Mar 2, 2024
    FINTRAC detects a cyber incident and takes its corporate systems offline.
  12. Mar 4, 2024
    Giant Tiger learns that a vendor handling customer communications was breached.
  13. Apr 12, 2024
    About 2.8 million Giant Tiger records appear on a hacker forum and are added to Have I Been Pwned.
  14. Late August 2024
    FINTRAC's web reporting system comes back after roughly five and a half months offline.
  15. Mar 31, 2025
    Deadline for businesses to file reports backlogged during the FINTRAC outage.
Sources: Nissan Canada Finance and Bell statements via Security Affairs and Dark Reading; ESET, Advisor.ca, IT World Canada, OPC, BleepingComputer, FINTRAC, The Logic, Have I Been Pwned.
CaseSectorWhat was exposed or disruptedReported scaleOutcome
Nissan Canada Finance (Dec 2017)Auto financeNames, addresses, vehicle details, VINs, credit scores, loan amounts, monthly paymentsUp to 1.13 million customers12 months of free TransUnion credit monitoring offered
Bell Canada (May 2017, Jan 2018)TelecomEmail addresses, names, some phone numbers, user names and account numbers1.9 million emails (2017); under 100,000 customers (2018)RCMP investigation; Bell says it added security measures
BMO and Simplii (May 2018)BankingNames, dates of birth, social insurance numbers, account detailsUp to 90,000 at first; later class actions covered 113,000+ BMO and 10,000+ Simplii clientsBanks refused ransom; $23 million in court-approved settlements
Moneris (Nov 2023)PaymentsMerchant IDs, issue logs, names and addresses tied to legacy gift cardsNot statedData from a corporate shared drive released by Medusa
Global Affairs Canada (Dec 2023 to Jan 2024)Federal governmentStaff personal information, emails, calendars, contactsNot statedPrivacy Commissioner investigation
RCMP (Feb 2024)Federal policingBreach of RCMP networks; scope under investigationNot statedCriminal investigation; RCMP said operations were not affected
FINTRAC (Mar 2024)Federal financial intelligenceCorporate systems taken offline; no evidence data was removedWeb reporting down about five and a half monthsBacklog deadline of Mar 31, 2025
Giant Tiger (Mar to Apr 2024)RetailNames, emails, phone numbers, physical addresses2.8 million records (Have I Been Pwned)No payment data or passwords involved, per the company

Figures are as reported by each organization, court or the outlets in the sources. "Not stated" means no official number was published.

Reported scale of the consumer breaches (people or records)
Giant Tiger, 2024 (records)
2,842,669
Bell, 2017 (email addresses)
1,900,000
Nissan Canada Finance, 2017 (customers)
1,130,000
BMO, 2018 (class members)
113,000
Simplii, 2018 (class members)
10,000
Sources: Have I Been Pwned; Dark Reading; Security Affairs; Advisor.ca. The units differ, so treat this as a rough comparison of scale.

December 2017: Nissan Canada Finance

What happened

On December 11, 2017, Nissan Canada Finance, the lending arm that finances Nissan and Infiniti vehicles in Canada, became aware that someone had gained unauthorized access to customer personal information. It began notifying customers about ten days later, by email and with a security notice on its website. The company said it was still investigating exactly which records had been touched.

The impact

Nissan Canada Finance said up to about 1.13 million current and past customers who financed a vehicle through it or through Infiniti Financial Services Canada could be affected. The data at risk included names, addresses, vehicle make and model, vehicle identification numbers (VINs), credit scores, loan amounts and monthly payments. The company said it had no indication that payment card information was involved, or that customers who financed vehicles outside Canada were affected.

The response

The company offered affected customers 12 months of free credit monitoring through TransUnion and said it was working with law enforcement. Because the full scope was not yet known, it notified the whole customer base rather than waiting to narrow the list.

What happened next

Lending data matters even without card numbers. A credit score, loan balance and monthly payment are exactly what a scammer needs to pose convincingly as the lender, so customers were best served by treating unexpected calls about their loan as suspect.

May 2017 and January 2018: Bell Canada, twice

What happened

Bell Canada, the country's largest telecommunications company, reported two separate breaches within about eight months. The first was disclosed in May 2017. In late January 2018 it disclosed a second, smaller incident in which hackers illegally accessed some customer information.

The impact

In the first breach, Bell said about 1.9 million customer email addresses and about 1,700 names and phone numbers were accessed. In the second, it said fewer than 100,000 customers were affected. The data included names and email addresses and, in some cases, phone numbers, user names or account numbers. Bell said there was no indication that credit card or other banking information was accessed in either incident.

The response

For the January 2018 breach, Bell said it was contacting the customers involved and had notified the appropriate government agencies, including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. Police opened an investigation. In its notices, Bell said it had put new security and identity and access management measures in place.

What happened next

Neither incident involved financial data, but an email that quotes your real account number is far more convincing than a generic one, which makes this kind of leak a strong starting point for phishing.

May 2018: BMO and Simplii Financial

What happened

On Monday, May 28, 2018, two Canadian banks announced separate but apparently related incidents. Simplii Financial, CIBC's direct-banking brand, said it had learned over the weekend that fraudsters may have electronically accessed personal and account information for about 40,000 of its clients. About an hour later, the Bank of Montreal (BMO) said it had been contacted on the Sunday by people claiming to hold the personal data of some of its customers. BMO said it believed the attack came from outside Canada and appeared to be linked to the Simplii incident.

The attackers then emailed Canadian media outlets. They demanded $1 million from each bank by 11:59 p.m. and threatened to release or sell the data. To prove their claim, they included samples of customer records, which at least one customer contacted by reporters confirmed were accurate.

The impact

Reports at the time put the total at up to 90,000 customers: about 40,000 at Simplii and fewer than 50,000 at BMO. The data reportedly included names, dates of birth, social insurance numbers and account balances. That combination is far more dangerous than a list of email addresses, because a SIN and date of birth can be used to apply for credit in someone else's name.

The response

Both banks refused to pay. BMO said its practice was "not to make payments to fraudsters" and that the exposures it had identified had been closed off. Both banks contacted authorities, said they would reach out to affected customers, offered support including credit monitoring, and urged clients to watch their accounts closely.

What happened next

Class actions followed in Ontario. According to a 2021 report in Advisor.ca, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice approved settlements of $21.2 million with BMO and $1.8 million with CIBC. The classes covered more than 113,000 BMO clients and more than 10,000 Simplii clients, larger than the early estimates. Payments were tiered by how much personal information had been exposed, with more for people whose SIN and date of birth were compromised. Separately, the banks had already reimbursed fraudulent transfers, about $6.85 million at BMO and $1.8 million at CIBC.

November 2018: mandatory breach reporting arrives

The three private-sector cases above all happened before Canada had a federal duty to report breaches. That changed on November 1, 2018, when breach reporting rules under PIPEDA, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, came into force.

  • The test. An organization must report a breach to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) and notify affected people when the breach creates a "real risk of significant harm." Harm includes identity theft, financial loss, humiliation and damage to reputation.
  • Records for every breach. Organizations must keep a record of every breach of security safeguards involving personal information, even when it doesn't meet the reporting test, and keep it for two years.
  • Penalties. Knowingly breaking the reporting, notification or record-keeping rules is an offence, with fines of up to $100,000.

PIPEDA covers private businesses. Federal departments such as Global Affairs Canada fall under the separate Privacy Act, and several provinces have their own privacy laws.

November 2023: Moneris and the Medusa gang

What happened

Moneris Solutions is a major Canadian payment processor whose network supports the card terminals used by retailers across the country. In November 2023, the Medusa ransomware gang listed Moneris on its leak website and posted screenshots of what it said was stolen data. A Canada-based threat researcher at the security firm Emsisoft drew public attention to the listing. Medusa demanded $6 million to delete the data and said it would publish it in eight days otherwise.

The impact

Moneris initially said an external party had attempted an attack and that its cybersecurity team had prevented access to any critical data. It said a full audit found that none of its data-loss prevention policies had been triggered. Later in November, Medusa posted the data it claimed to have, saying it included employee and client account and email information, ID numbers, contracts, presentations and financial transaction reports. Those are the gang's claims and were not independently confirmed.

The response

When asked again by IT World Canada, Moneris pointed to an updated statement on its website. That statement acknowledged that the gang had accessed and released data from a corporate shared drive, including merchant IDs, issue logs, and names and addresses related to legacy gift cards. Moneris maintained that its critical systems had not been compromised.

What happened next

The case follows the usual pattern of a modern extortion gang: a public claim, a countdown and sample files to add pressure. It also shows that a company can block the damaging part of an attack and still have files stolen.

January 2024: Global Affairs Canada

What happened

Global Affairs Canada (GAC), the department responsible for foreign affairs, trade and development, detected malicious cyber activity on its internal network in January 2024. On January 24 it deliberately cut off part of its remote access to deal with the problem, and some staff were told not to work remotely. According to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, unauthorized individuals had gained access to the department's virtual private network (VPN), the system employees use to connect securely to headquarters in Ottawa. CBC News, citing internal emails, reported that the breach affected the network from December 20, 2023, to January 24, 2024. Another report citing a government email gave December 30 as the start of the at-risk window.

The impact

GAC said early results showed unauthorized access to the personal information of users, including employees. Reports described at least two internal drives being affected, along with the emails, calendars and contacts of many staff. No public figure was given for the number of people affected. GAC said critical services and external communications kept running, and that it could not share more details "for operational and security reasons."

The response

The department said it was contacting affected people and had reported the breach to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. It worked with Shared Services Canada and the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, part of the Communications Security Establishment, to restore connectivity.

What happened next

On February 26, 2024, the OPC announced a formal investigation after receiving several complaints. It said it would examine whether GAC's safeguards for personal information were adequate and whether the department complied with the Privacy Act. GAC had also been hit by an earlier cyberattack, detected in January 2022, which raised questions from security experts about whether the network had been fully cleaned up after the first incident. No attribution for the 2024 breach had been made public in the sources we reviewed.

February 2024: the RCMP

What happened

In late February 2024, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police said it was dealing with a breach of its networks and had opened a criminal investigation to establish its scope. Its chief security officer described a "cyber event" in a message to staff and urged employees to stay vigilant, according to CBC reporting.

The impact

The RCMP said the situation was evolving quickly, but that there was no impact on its operations and no known threat to the safety and security of Canadians. It also said there was no indication that foreign police or intelligence services were affected. No details about what data, if any, was taken have been published in the sources we reviewed.

The response

The RCMP notified the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and said it was working with Shared Services Canada, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security and other federal partners.

What happened next: the website outage

Around the same time, the RCMP's main website was unreachable. On February 25 it returned an error page and redirected to a setup page normally seen only on a brand-new site, which led many, including us in our original post, to wonder whether the two events were connected. The RCMP later said they were not. It attributed the website outage to high traffic overloading servers managed by Shared Services Canada, and the site was back early on February 26. It is a useful reminder not to assume that every outage during a breach is part of the attack.

March 2024: FINTRAC

What happened

The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) is the country's financial intelligence unit. Banks, money services businesses, casinos, real estate firms and others file reports with it on suspicious and large transactions, and it passes intelligence to police. On March 2, 2024, FINTRAC detected a cyber incident affecting its own systems. As a precaution, it took its corporate systems offline. An official from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security later said a "malicious actor" had gained unauthorized access.

The impact

FINTRAC said from the start that the incident did not involve its intelligence or classified systems. In a March 22 update, it said forensic work with the Cyber Centre and other federal agencies had found no evidence that information was removed or lost. No group publicly claimed the attack in the sources we reviewed.

The disruption was long, though. The Logic reported that FINTRAC's web reporting system stayed down until late August 2024, about five and a half months. The online registry for money services businesses was also unavailable for months, which affected licence renewals. Large financial institutions, which file 96% of reports, kept filing through a secure data feed. Smaller money services businesses, many without access to that feed, built up months of unfiled reports.

The response and what happened next

FINTRAC worked with federal partners to restore operations and said most systems were back by fall 2024. Businesses were given until March 31, 2025, to file backlogged reports. The case is a lesson in how a breach with no confirmed data loss can still cause serious operational harm to the businesses that depend on a system.

March to April 2024: Giant Tiger

What happened

Giant Tiger is a Canadian discount retail chain. In March 2024 it told customers that it had learned, on March 4, of a security problem at a third-party vendor it used to manage customer communications and engagement. Contact information for certain customers had been accessed without authorization. The company did not name the vendor.

The impact

On April 12, 2024, someone posted what they called the full Giant Tiger customer database on a hacker forum, claiming 2.8 million records. Downloading it cost a few forum credits, which members can earn easily, so the data was effectively free to anyone who wanted it. The breach notification service Have I Been Pwned added the data set the same day, with 2,842,669 email addresses. It listed names, email addresses, phone numbers and physical addresses as the exposed data. Have I Been Pwned also reported that 46% of the addresses were already in its database from earlier breaches.

The response

Giant Tiger notified affected customers and said no payment information or passwords were involved. It declined to identify the vendor, citing the investigation and security concerns.

What happened next

Even without payment data, names, addresses and emails from a familiar retailer make convincing phishing bait. The case also shows how much customer data now sits with marketing vendors rather than with the retailer itself.

What this means for you and for organizations

If your data was in one of these breaches

  1. Check whether your email address appears. Have I Been Pwned lets you search an email address for free across known breaches, including Giant Tiger. You can also sign up to be told about future breaches.
  2. Expect targeted phishing. Most of these leaks included names, emails, phone numbers or account details. Treat calls, texts and emails that mention a breach, a refund or a "security check" as suspicious. Call the company back on a number from a statement or its official site.
  3. If your SIN or date of birth was exposed, protect your credit. Accept any free monitoring the company offers. Nissan, for example, offered TransUnion monitoring, and the banks offered it in 2018. Canada's two national credit bureaus are Equifax and TransUnion. Contact both to ask about putting a fraud alert on your file and to review your credit report.
  4. Change reused passwords and turn on two-step sign-in. None of these breaches was reported to include passwords, but criminals often combine leaks. A unique password and a second sign-in step stop most account takeovers.
  5. Report fraud. If someone uses your information, report it to your local police and to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, and tell your bank right away.

For organizations

LessonWhere it showed upWhat to do
Vendors hold your customers' data tooGiant Tiger (communications vendor)Inventory which vendors hold personal data, limit what they get, and write breach notice duties into contracts.
Remote access is a front doorGlobal Affairs Canada (VPN)Require multi-factor sign-in on VPNs and remote tools, and watch for logins from unusual places.
Stopping encryption is not stopping theftMoneris (shared drive)Restrict and monitor shared drives, and plan for data being published even if systems stay up.
Outages hurt the people who depend on youFINTRAC (5.5 months of web reporting downtime)Keep backup channels for critical services, and communicate often with affected users.
Extortion demands come with a deadlineBMO and Simplii ($1 million each)Decide your ransom policy and communications plan before an incident, not during one.
The law requires records and noticeAll private-sector cases after Nov 1, 2018Keep a log of every breach for two years and report to the OPC when there is a real risk of significant harm.

FAQ

What was the biggest data breach in this list?

By number of records, Giant Tiger's 2024 vendor breach was the largest, with about 2.8 million records listed by Have I Been Pwned. By sensitivity, the 2018 BMO and Simplii thefts were arguably more serious, because they reportedly included social insurance numbers and dates of birth.

Did BMO or Simplii pay the ransom?

No. Both banks refused, and BMO said its practice was not to pay fraudsters. They later settled class actions for a combined $23 million, approved by an Ontario court.

Was the RCMP website outage part of the cyberattack?

According to the RCMP, no. It said the February 2024 website outage was caused by high traffic overloading servers, and was unrelated to the cyber event on its networks.

Do Canadian companies have to tell me about a breach?

Since November 1, 2018, organizations covered by PIPEDA must notify affected people and the Privacy Commissioner when a breach creates a real risk of significant harm. Federal government bodies fall under the Privacy Act, and some provinces have their own laws.

Who was behind these attacks?

In most cases no attacker has been publicly identified by authorities in the sources we reviewed. The Moneris incident was claimed by the Medusa ransomware gang. The other attacks had no public claim or official attribution.

Sources

Top image: "Server racks, one empty - IMG 3636" by Jemimus, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons (resized). Charts by Thank You Robot.

Post a Comment

0 Comments